In a recent workers’ compensation case, the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal addressed whether an injured employee forfeited his benefits when he was terminated for cause. According to Louisiana law, an employee who willfully makes false statements for the purpose of obtaining benefits will forfeit those benefits. At issue in a case of potential forfeited benefits is the relationship between the false statement and the claim for benefits.
James R. Green worked as a forklift operator for Allied Building Stores, Inc. (ABS). After suffering a back injury while attempting to load a heavy cabinet onto a pallet, Mr. Green was taken to the hospital, given Toradol, and placed on light duty work. He returned to work that day, but he then experienced pain and was allowed to take the rest of the day off work. A few days later, Mr. Green returned to work but then requested leave to see his doctor because he remained in pain.
Mr. Green returned to work after treatment that Monday, but he presented an “altered” certification stating that he was to return to work on the following day, Tuesday. Mr. Green’s supervisor then received a fax from Mr. Green’s doctor’s office, stating that Mr. Green could return to work that day, Monday. The supervisor called Mr. Green, and Mr. Green stated he would immediately return to work. He was terminated the next morning.
At trial, the issue was whether Mr. Green had been fired for cause, and whether he was entitled to post-termination benefits. The workers’ compensation judge held that Mr. Green was not entitled to supplemental earnings benefits because he falsified the form stating he was unable to earn at least 90% of his pre-injury wages.
Louisiana law holds that an employee forfeits SEB when they are terminated for cause. The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that false statements that are willfully made for the purpose of obtaining benefits require forfeiture of benefits.
Whether to impose or deny forfeiture under Louisiana law, La. R.S. 23:1208, is a factual finding. Mr. Green contended he did not alter the certification form. A student worker at his doctor’s office altered the form to correct his birth date and return to work date. At the time, ABS had paid Mr. Green’s medical bills and offered him a job meeting the medical restrictions, with the same pay. Mr. Green did not refuse the offer of work.
The law holds that benefits may be forfeited when there is a false statement willfully made for the purpose of obtaining or defeating benefits. While all these requirements must be met before a claimant is penalized, the law applies to any false statements. It is the relationship between the false statement and the pending claim that determines if the statement was willfully made for the purpose of receiving benefits.
Here, the court stated that the alteration of the medical excuse centered on whether Mr. Green would return to work that day, or the next morning. The alteration did not center on whether Mr. Green would obtain workers’ compensation benefits. Mr. Green was willing to work on Monday, but his supervisor told him to return the following morning, Tuesday. It was manifestly and clearly wrong for the workers’ compensation judge to deny SEBs.
The court remanded for the workers’ compensation judge to set supplemental earnings benefits from those dates, based on Dr. Woods’ testimony.
The Louisiana workers’ compensation attorneys at Lavis Law help injured employees pursue compensation for their injuries. We provide a free, confidential consultation and can be reached by calling 866.558.9151.
More Blog Posts:
Louisiana Court Holds that Injured Employee Met Burden of Proving Inability to Earn 90% of Pre-Injury Wages, Louisiana Job Injury Law Blog, December 17, 2015
Louisiana Court Affirms Finding of Injured Employee’s Credibility, Entitlement to Supplemental Earnings Benefits, Louisiana Job Injury Law Blog, November 23, 2015